Gary Marcus

The statement and images engage in public discourse by drawing parallels between historical appeasement policies and current geopolitical situations. The intent is to critique the idea of appeasement by referencing historical consequences, suggesting that similar strategies may not be effective today.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to critique appeasement policies without direct harm, but the historical comparison could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement attempts to promote understanding by drawing historical parallels, but it may lack empathy towards differing perspectives.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in critique but could be seen as dismissive of alternative viewpoints, potentially leading to polarized dialogue. [-1]