Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of negotiating with leaders accused of war crimes, specifically referencing Putin. It reflects on historical diplomatic principles and questions current approaches to international relations.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises concerns about the potential harm of negotiating with alleged war criminals.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it takes a firm stance against negotiation without exploring the complexities of the situation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but presents a critical view of current diplomatic strategies.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by engaging in a relevant public issue, though it could benefit from a more nuanced exploration of the topic. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.