Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 59
3/2/2025, 6:41:43 PM
X
In reply to:
333
@Drei3d
·
140d
@GaryMarcus yes, absolutely! My apologies I misspoke, I believe he would be willing to try, but I think he WILL lose and he knows that. In such a case, starting ww3 is tantamount to nuclear war, and I don't know if he is willing too (although I think his will is increasing...). Thoughts?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
140d
@Drei3d You do the math:
Ordy
@Ordy_Nari
·
140d
@elonmusk
333
@Drei3d
·
140d
@GaryMarcus I really want to say “ this man is gonna plunge Europe into war”, but do we know if Putin would even try again? Unless he rearms massively, but even in such a case, considering how this one played out, it would be too much of a stretch, no? Like that’s literally just starting WW3
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
140d
Hitler’s appeasers said basically the same thing.

1/2
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
140d

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing geopolitical tensions and potential conflicts involving the US and Russia. It implies that US support could influence the outcome of a conflict, touching on themes of international relations and military power.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly incite harm but discusses potential conflict, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as provocative, potentially escalating tensions. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on power dynamics. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on hypothetical outcomes.