Geoffrey Hinton
@geoffreyhinton
·
141d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the impact of Elon Musk's actions on scientific institutions and the broader implications for free speech and scientific integrity. The tone is critical and confrontational, focusing on accountability and the consequences of Musk's actions.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it includes a confrontational tone and suggests expulsion from a prestigious society, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it includes personal attacks and potentially defamatory claims about Musk's actions and character. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it includes personal attacks and lacks a focus on constructive solutions or engagement. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by engaging in a public debate about the consequences of Musk's actions, but it does so in a manner that could be seen as irresponsible due to the personal attacks. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.