Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
3/3/2025, 12:20:46 AM
X
In reply to:
Dimitar Pachov
@dpachov
·
296d
@GaryMarcus Last summer? It's been going down since 2013 at minimum.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
296d
When I saw signs of decline last summer and called on his friends to stage an intervention, people thought I was mean-spirited, but I meant it; it would have been a good thing.

Where we are is that a man who used to commanded tremendous respect is now looked on with pity and…
Claire Lehmann
@clairlemon
·
296d
Elon Musk’s tragic cognitive decline is a lesson for all high performing people: drugs are no substitute for exercise when keeping your mind & brain healthy in your 40s, 50s & beyond.

The statement is part of a public discourse discussing the perceived cognitive decline of a public figure, Elon Musk, and the broader implications for high-performing individuals. The conversation involves multiple participants and touches on societal issues related to health, public perception, and the responsibilities of influential figures.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but it contributes to a conversation that could be perceived as harmful by discussing an individual's cognitive decline publicly. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others to some extent, but it is part of a conversation that could be seen as disrespectful or speculative about a public figure's health. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is part of a conversation that could be interpreted as critical or judgmental. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but does not include personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It responds to a previous comment with an observation about trends, maintaining a focus on the issue rather than the individual. [+1]