Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
3/3/2025, 2:54:07 AM
X
In reply to:
Gene
@genefj
·
296d
@davetroy @GaryMarcus @DHuskytron Actually, if Putin and his team were running the USA right now, it’s not obvious what they would do differently, except perhaps be more conservative and avoid investing in crypto.
Dave Troy
@davetroy
·
296d
@genefj @GaryMarcus @DHuskytron Well said.
Gene
@genefj
·
296d
@GaryMarcus @DHuskytron @davetroy The convergence theory from the 1970s suggested Soviet socialism and Western capitalism might merge into a hybrid system, blending planned and market elements. Ironically, it is the convergence of corruption, not economics, that seems to be occurring, at least with the US.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
296d
@genefj @DHuskytron @davetroy 100%
Gene
@genefj
·
296d
@DHuskytron @GaryMarcus @davetroy The entire executive branch of the US government is blatantly engaging in self-dealing, also known as systemic corruption or it could be called Putinism.
D. HuskyTron
@DHuskytron
·
296d
@GaryMarcus @davetroy Something tells me that this is a very bad thing... 🤦‍♂️

The statement 'if?' is a brief, rhetorical response to a conversation about political corruption and governance, specifically comparing the US government to Putin's administration. The conversation involves a critique of systemic corruption in the US, suggesting a convergence with Russian-style governance. The statement 'if?' questions the certainty or implications of the previous assertion, potentially challenging the idea that there would be no difference if Putin were in charge.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but questions a potentially harmful assertion, maintaining a neutral tone.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By questioning the assertion, the statement could promote further dialogue and understanding, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites further dialogue by questioning the previous assertion, avoiding personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]