Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a public issue related to Social Security and its portrayal by a prominent figure. It critiques the rhetoric used against Social Security, suggesting it precedes attempts to cut benefits.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by attributing motives to a group ('right-wing') without evidence, which might polarize the discussion. [-1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does so in a way that could be perceived as an ad hominem attack, particularly by labeling the rhetoric as a 'classic attack' by a political group. [-1]