Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
347d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
331d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
728d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
331d
Senior Official for Public Diplomacy
@UnderSecPD
·
333d
The statement criticizes the EU's Digital Services Act, labeling it as a 'totalitarian censorship monster' and accuses Europe of wanting to censor globally. It praises a public figure for opposing this act, suggesting a shift in US policy towards supporting free speech.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy or dignity of those involved, using terms like 'totalitarian' and 'monster' which could be considered disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but does so in a way that could be seen as a personal attack on the EU, rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.