Gary Marcus

The statement criticizes a public figure's followers for not fact-checking, implying a lack of critical thinking among them. It suggests that those who value factual accuracy have stopped following the individual. The tone is dismissive and critical.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm but implies a negative judgment on a group of people, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the dignity of the followers by generalizing them as non-fact-checkers. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes a broad generalization. [-1]