Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues of censorship, international relations, and perceptions of respect between nations. It suggests a link between Germany's censorship and its reaction to global changes, implying a need for more open dialogue.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by suggesting that Germany's censorship is a cause of its shock at global changes, which might be perceived as a critique rather than constructive feedback. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It challenges Germany's policies, which could be seen as disrespectful, but it does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement attempts to promote understanding by encouraging Germans to consider different perspectives, though it could be more empathetic in its approach. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of Germany's policies but does not resort to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on policy rather than individuals. [+1]