Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -137
3/4/2025, 2:14:45 PM
X
In reply to:
a newsman
@a_newsman
路
332d
The idea Americans should sacrifice their god given right to free expression in order to protect a foreign country from criticism is one of the most offensive things I鈥檝e ever heard
a newsman
@a_newsman
路
332d
You鈥檙e allowed to not like or even hate a foreign country in America.
Elise Stefanik
@EliseStefanik
路
332d
Under President @realDonaldTrump, colleges and universities will be held accountable. Antisemitism and anti-Israel hate will not be tolerated on American campuses. Promises made, promises kept.

@POTUS @realDonaldTrump @WhiteHouse

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the balance between free expression and policies against antisemitism on campuses. It critiques the idea of limiting free speech to protect a foreign country from criticism, suggesting this is offensive. The tone is assertive and protective of free speech rights.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement upholds the principle of doing no harm by advocating for free expression, a fundamental right.聽[+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by challenging policies perceived as limiting free speech, without personal attacks.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for free speech, contributing to societal discourse on rights and policies.聽[+1]