In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
297d
Noah Smith 🐇
@Noahpinion
·
298d
The Democrats
@TheDemocrats
·
298d
The statement criticizes a trade war decision, implying it was poorly thought out. It is part of a broader conversation critiquing a public figure's actions and influence.
- The statement uses strong language ('stupidest') which may not promote understanding or empathy. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual involved, as it uses derogatory language. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.