Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement addresses a public issue related to political strategy and public engagement by Republican lawmakers in response to backlash over policy decisions. It reflects on the interaction between elected officials and their constituents, which is a matter of public concern.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but suggests avoiding in-person town halls, which could be seen as avoiding direct confrontation with constituents.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it suggests avoiding direct dialogue with constituents. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it advises avoiding town halls rather than addressing concerns. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to guide political strategy, but it does not necessarily aim for the betterment of society by avoiding public discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by advising on political strategy, but it could be seen as avoiding responsible engagement with the public.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.