In reply to:
Meta Nomad
@r_cirakoglu
·
298d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
298d
Brian Krassenstein
@krassenstein
·
298d
The statement and conversation involve public figures and address international trade policies, tariffs, and political relations, which are significant public issues. The tone is critical and somewhat informal, using strong language and potentially inflammatory rhetoric.
- The use of strong language and informal tone may not promote a respectful dialogue, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, using language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses confrontational language. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, which does not foster productive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.