Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement engages in a discussion about the distinction between science and engineering, and critiques the impact of a public figure on scientific infrastructure. It addresses public issues related to science policy and infrastructure.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement attempts to clarify a distinction between science and engineering, which can contribute to understanding, but it also includes a personal attack by blocking for ad hominem.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but engages in a form of public shaming by blocking and calling out ad hominem attacks. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of personal attack by blocking and calling out ad hominem, which detracts from constructive dialogue. [-1]