The statement engages in a discussion about the distinction between science and engineering, and critiques the impact of a public figure on scientific infrastructure. It addresses public issues related to science policy and infrastructure.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement attempts to clarify a distinction between science and engineering, which can contribute to understanding, but it also includes a personal attack by blocking for ad hominem.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects privacy but engages in a form of public shaming by blocking and calling out ad hominem attacks.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in a form of personal attack by blocking and calling out ad hominem, which detracts from constructive dialogue.
[-1]