The statement criticizes a political strategy of avoiding constituents, implying it is a poor long-term approach. It uses strong language to express frustration with the decision to stop in-person town halls, as reported in the accompanying image.
- The statement uses harsh language, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it uses derogatory language, potentially violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be seen as a personal attack, rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.