Marianne Williamson

The statement and linked content suggest a discussion about the potential threats to Social Security, a significant public issue. The tone appears to be alarmist, possibly aiming to draw attention to perceived threats to a critical social program. The intent seems to be to inform or warn the public about these threats, though the language used ('infamous chainsaw') may imply a dramatic or sensational approach.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses dramatic language ('infamous chainsaw') which could incite fear or anxiety, potentially causing harm by creating unnecessary panic. This violates the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not appear to engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the language could be seen as disrespectful if it targets specific individuals or groups without evidence.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sensational language that may polarize rather than foster constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it lacks specifics and may rely on sensationalism rather than reasoned argument. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement attempts to use influence to raise awareness about a public issue, which aligns with using influence for societal betterment, but the approach may not be constructive. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech but may not use the platform responsibly due to its sensational tone, which could mislead or misinform the public.