In reply to:
Andriy Burkov
@burkov
·
301d
The statement is part of a conversation discussing the cost and value of AI agents compared to human PhDs. It uses humor and sarcasm to critique the pricing and perceived value of AI agents.
- The statement does not cause harm; it uses humor to make a point. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the perceived absurdity of AI agent pricing. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism through sarcasm without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.