Reposted by Marianne Williamson
The statement suggests that a French senator has made a comment about a situation involving Trump, which could relate to public discourse on international relations or political analysis. However, without specific details on the content of the senator's description, it's challenging to evaluate how well it upholds the principles of public discourse.
- The statement does not provide enough information to determine if it does harm or promotes understanding.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- Without the content of the senator's description, it's unclear if it promotes understanding, empathy, or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but lacks detail for further evaluation.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.