Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
332d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
333d
The statement critiques the Democratic Party's resistance to Trump, suggesting their agenda is unclear and unpopular due to narcissism. It engages in public discourse by addressing political issues and party dynamics.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by attributing narcissism to a group, which may not promote constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of others by making broad negative generalizations about a political group. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in ad hominem attacks by labeling the group as narcissistic. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.