Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the allocation of resources in AI development and the challenges of current AI technologies. It critiques the focus on AGI timelines and emphasizes the importance of solving existing AI issues.
- The statement does no harm and focuses on constructive critique of resource allocation in AI development, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need to address current AI challenges, fostering a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the topic rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for better resource allocation in AI, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to discuss AI development issues, maintaining integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.