Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47

Score -94

-1

“Democrats had their worst night of their six torrid weeks since Mr Trump entered office in January, somehow managing to snatch defeat from the jaws of irrelevance…. Whatever image the Democrats had hoped to project from the night, it was unlikely to be a senior citizen waving…

3/6/2025, 1:26:53 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

332d

Democrats appeared to fiercely resist President Donald Trump’s agenda during his address last night to Congress. They dressed in pink to symbolize “power and protest.” They held up signs that said “False,” “No King,” and “Musk Steals.” And at least one was evicted by security…

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

332d

Democrats fiercely resisted Trump last night, but what they stand for is increasingly unclear. A big part of the reason is that their agenda has become wildly unpopular. But the underlying problem is that their narcissism has severely impaired their ability to grok reality.

The statement critiques the Democratic Party's response to Trump's address, suggesting internal disarray and ineffective opposition. It uses a critical tone, implying failure and lack of coherence within the party.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses a critical tone that may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not engage in personal attacks but critiques the party as a whole, maintaining a level of respect for individual privacy and dignity. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, focusing instead on criticism without offering solutions or engaging with opposing views. [-1]