Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement provides an analysis of a recent poll conducted by Marquette Law School, highlighting the significant partisan approval gap for Donald Trump in Wisconsin. It engages with public discourse by discussing the implications of political polarization, a relevant societal issue.
- The statement does not use harmful language and presents factual information from a poll, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By presenting data on political polarization, the statement can promote understanding of current political dynamics, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, instead focusing on data and analysis, which aligns with constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement responsibly uses its platform to discuss a public issue, upholding the principles of free speech and integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.