Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement appears to be a sarcastic remark about Hunter Biden's financial struggles and artistic output, implying a connection between his father's presidency and his success. It seems to mock his situation rather than engage in a constructive discussion.
- The statement could be seen as mocking, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy and dignity of Hunter Biden, potentially engaging in a form of public shaming. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive dialogue or understanding, instead opting for sarcasm. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.