In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the implications of a reported issue regarding government efficiency and the employment of staffers. It challenges the notion of a scandal and suggests an alternative perspective on the employment of auditors.
- The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the premise of the original post without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by responsibly questioning a public issue and contributing to the civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.