Jake Tapper

The statement criticizes a political appointment by drawing a historical parallel to anti-Semitic events, suggesting that the appointee's views are dangerous. It uses strong language to express disapproval and implies a connection to historical violence.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, potentially inciting further division. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not respect the dignity of the individual being criticized, using terms like 'pogromist.' [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead focusing on condemnation. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism. [-2]