Rashida Tlaib

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing public opinion on a significant geopolitical issue, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The statement by @RepRashida suggests that party leaders are not aligned with voter sentiments and calls for policy action, specifically an arms embargo. The images provide data on American and Democratic sympathies, showing trends over time.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, particularly the use of terms like 'genocide' and 'apartheid.' [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but could be seen as disrespectful to those with differing views, potentially leading to divisive discourse. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for Palestinians but may lack balance by not acknowledging the complexities of the conflict.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of party leaders, which is constructive if aimed at policy change, but could be seen as a personal attack if not substantiated.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to advocate for policy change, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]