In reply to:
A.T.
@ATetrick44
·
311d
The statement 'not wrong' is a brief agreement with a previous comment that calls for direct action against a government perceived as corrupt. The original conversation involves a critique of political figures and a call to action, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates about governance and elections.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it supports a call for potentially harmful actions, which could be seen as a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it supports a conversation that uses strong language against political figures, which could be seen as a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it aligns with a call for aggressive action, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it supports a confrontational stance, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, as it supports a divisive and potentially harmful approach, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly, as it aligns with a call for aggressive action, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.