Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a broader conversation about political figures and their actions, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, comparing Clinton's actions to those of another figure with a focus on 'humanity' and 'stupidity.'

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses derogatory language ('stupidity') which could be considered harmful. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in a form of personal attack by labeling actions as 'stupidity.' [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the substance of the actions being discussed. [-1]