In reply to:
Nikki Stanzione
@NikkiStanzione
·
125d
Christopher C. Cuomo
@ChrisCuomo
·
126d
The statement engages in a discussion about cancel culture and accountability, which are public issues. It implies skepticism towards the motives behind cancel culture, suggesting that claims of accountability are often used to justify it.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies a negative view of those who engage in cancel culture, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in harassment or hate speech, but it could be interpreted as undermining the privacy and dignity of those who advocate for accountability.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes a generalized assertion about people's motives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.