The statement is part of a broader conversation about public figures and cancel culture, which constitutes public discourse. The reply by @psiddiqshow seems dismissive and focuses on social media status rather than engaging with the substantive issue.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the conversation, which could detract from meaningful dialogue.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not respect the dignity of others by focusing on follower count rather than the issue at hand.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage constructively with the original topic, instead making a personal remark about social media influence.
[-1]