Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in a debate about the potential of AI to make significant scientific discoveries, challenging the optimistic projections of AI capabilities. It questions the feasibility of AI achieving Nobel-level discoveries independently, using a graph to illustrate skepticism.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive debate about AI capabilities. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by providing a counterpoint to optimistic AI projections, encouraging critical thinking. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, maintaining a respectful tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.