Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the traditions of the Supreme Court and the implications of a justice's actions. It aims to clarify misconceptions about political affiliations based on social events.
- The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying a misconception rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by explaining the tradition of the Supreme Court parties, fostering a more informed perspective. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a potential misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.