In reply to:
Sabine Hossenfelder
@skdh
·
312d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
312d
Max Tegmark
@tegmark
·
313d
The statement engages in a discussion about the potential and limitations of AI in making scientific discoveries. It acknowledges the potential for AI to assist in scientific research but critiques its current limitations in causal reasoning, pattern evaluation, and originality. The statement suggests that AI will be most useful as a tool for scientists rather than an independent discoverer.
- The statement does not cause harm and contributes to a constructive discussion about AI's role in science. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by acknowledging both the potential and limitations of AI, encouraging a balanced view. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI's capabilities without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.