Andrew Yang

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 123

The statement advocates for extending Daylight Saving Time (DST) throughout the year, suggesting that the biannual switch is harmful. It links to a policy proposal by Andrew Yang, indicating a substantive engagement with a public issue related to time policy and its societal impacts.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a policy change, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing a rationale for the policy change, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By advocating for a policy change, the statement uses influence for societal betterment, aligning with this principle. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss a public policy issue. [+1]