Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a journalist questioning a senator about the influence of a wealthy individual on public policy and job security, which is a matter of public interest.
- The question is posed in a way that seeks to explore the implications of political actions on public welfare, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The question encourages understanding and discussion about the role of wealth and influence in politics, promoting empathy and compassion for affected workers. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The question is direct and challenges the senator's stance, which can be seen as constructive criticism rather than a personal attack. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.