Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a discussion on a sensitive political issue, specifically negotiations with Hamas, which is a topic of public interest. The host's question frames Hamas in a negative light, while the envoy's response emphasizes the necessity of engaging with various parties as part of his role.
- The host's question could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by reinforcing negative stereotypes, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The question may not fully respect the dignity of those involved by labeling them in a negative manner, potentially violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The envoy's response promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of dialogue, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The exchange does not engage in personal attacks, maintaining a level of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.