Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement criticizes a public figure's response, suggesting it undermines peace. It engages in public discourse by addressing international relations and the conduct of influential individuals.
- The statement suggests that the response undermines peace, indicating a concern for harm reduction. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but indirectly addresses the dignity of the individuals involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the potential negative impact of the response. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the implications of the response. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.