Marianne Williamson

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 125
3/10/2025, 11:06:07 AM
X
In reply to:
Corrupt ParlorTricks
@CParlortricks
·
205d
@American4WD @marwilliamson She’s talking to her in group friends, who won’t ever feel real world consequences for contradicting established norms. She’s not talking to the actual left/working class, she doesn’t know us at all.
American 4WD
@American4WD
·
205d
@marwilliamson Soft punishment, lol. Wow, could you be more out of touch? We were already challenged and if you stood up for wild conspiracies… like natural immunity, it wasn’t a soft response. #endtheculturewar #dobetter.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
205d
Each of us will be challenged: are we standing up for what we believe is true; or are we standing down, aligning with what we think will make us more popular or at least less vulnerable to the soft punishment of social disapproval.

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a conversation about societal issues, specifically addressing the dynamics of social approval and the consequences of standing up for one's beliefs. The tone of the statement is defensive, aiming to refute assumptions made by another participant in the conversation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its defensive tone could escalate tensions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is dismissive of the other person's perspective.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on refuting the other person's assumptions without addressing the underlying issues. [-1]