Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a public figure, Darren Beattie, and his actions on social media, which relate to public discourse as they involve a senior government official and his conduct. The content of the deleted tweets, which included spreading unfounded rumors and personal attacks, is relevant to public discourse as it reflects on the behavior and integrity expected from public officials.
- The statement violates the principle of doing no harm with words, as it involves spreading unfounded rumors and derogatory comments. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement violates the principle of respecting privacy and dignity, as it involves spreading rumors about someone's sexuality and making derogatory comments. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism, as it involves personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The deletion of the tweets suggests an acknowledgment of a mistake, but without a public correction or apology, it only partially adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement violates the principle of using a platform responsibly, as it involves spreading false information and engaging in personal attacks. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.