Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement is a direct question posed to a public figure, Andrew Cuomo, regarding the use of taxpayer money for personal legal expenses related to sexual harassment cases. It addresses a public concern about the allocation of public funds and accountability of public officials, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not use harmful language but raises a critical question about public fund usage.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy to some extent but directly addresses allegations of sexual harassment, which are public matters involving a public figure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is confrontational but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on a specific issue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question the accountability of a public official, aiming for transparency and betterment of public fund usage. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by questioning a public figure on a matter of public interest. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.