In reply to:
brett
@MinisterBC
·
205d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
205d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the application of First Amendment rights, which is a substantive issue related to free speech and legal principles. The tone is corrective, aiming to clarify a legal misunderstanding.
- The statement does not cause harm and is focused on clarifying a legal point, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a perceived misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by discussing its application beyond American citizens, using the platform responsibly to clarify a legal concept. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.