Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement discusses the use of immigration authority by Secretary of State Marco Rubio to detain activists, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to immigration policy and civil liberties. The tone is informative, and the intent is to highlight the use of a rarely invoked legal provision.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it raises concerns about potential harm due to the use of broad immigration authority.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does mention individuals by name, which could impact their privacy. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does inform the public about a significant legal action.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by informing the public about governmental actions, using the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.