Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 177

The statement is a critique of a funding bill passed by Republicans, highlighting perceived negative impacts on veterans benefits, housing assistance, and social safety nets, while alleging favoritism towards Musk and Trump. The tone is critical and partisan, aiming to inform the public and justify the speaker's opposition to the bill.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language to criticize the bill, which could be seen as harmful to those supporting it, but it does not contain direct personal attacks or harmful rhetoric. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does mention public figures in a critical context.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of the bill's perceived negative impacts, but it does so in a partisan manner that may not foster empathy or compassion across political divides. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not invite dialogue or constructive criticism, focusing instead on a partisan critique. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the speaker's platform to influence public opinion against the bill, aiming for societal betterment by protecting social safety nets. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to critique a public policy issue, using the platform responsibly to inform constituents. [+1]