The statement expresses a critical opinion on the USDA's decision to end a program that supported local farmers by providing food to schools. It suggests a reversal of values, implying that beneficial actions are being perceived negatively and vice versa.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of a policy decision.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy and compassion, as it does not consider the reasons behind the USDA's decision or its potential benefits. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a broad generalization without addressing specific arguments or evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to criticize a policy decision, but it does not provide a constructive alternative or solution. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but lacks responsibility and integrity by not providing a balanced view or context. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.