Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the perceptions of swing voters towards the national Democratic Party, referencing a focus group study. It presents data to highlight dissatisfaction among voters, which is a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement does not directly harm with words and actions, but it could contribute to polarization by framing the Democratic Party as 'toxic.'Â [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on negative perceptions without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to share information, but it could be more responsible by providing context or solutions.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.