Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses a significant public issue involving the administrative leave of journalists at a major U.S. broadcasting agency, which is linked to a White House order aimed at reducing federal bureaucracy. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with governmental actions and their implications on media operations.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it highlights a potentially harmful action by the government affecting journalists.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the broader issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement raises awareness of a governmental action, potentially fostering understanding of its impact on media freedom. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather presents a factual account of events. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By bringing attention to this issue, the statement uses influence to inform the public about significant governmental actions. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on government actions and their implications for media operations. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.