In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the alleged misuse of the Justice Department by a political figure, which is a significant public issue. It presents a critical view of media reports and suggests an alternative perspective on the actions of the former president.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by accusing the media of lying and participating in government weaponization without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the integrity of journalists, which may not respect their dignity if the claims are unfounded. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and divisive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it makes broad accusations without engaging with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on a significant issue, but it does so in a polarizing manner. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.