Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a public figure making a provocative claim about potential military actions by the U.S., which is a matter of public concern and international relations. It addresses the actions of Hamas and references military actions against the Houthis, suggesting a stance on foreign policy and conflict resolution.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by escalating tensions and promoting military action, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does involve a threat of violence, which can be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of those involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses threatening language rather than seeking peaceful resolution. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a threat rather than a reasoned argument or discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to make a provocative claim, but it may not be responsible or uphold integrity due to its threatening nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.