In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
131d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
131d
The statement is a critical response to a conversation about political figures and their influence on government integrity. It suggests that certain individuals are intentionally undermining the government and questions the integrity of those close to power.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful by accusing individuals of wanting to destroy the government, which may not strive to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of individuals, which could be seen as disrespectful to their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes broad accusations without specific evidence or engagement with opposing views. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about perceived threats to government integrity, which could be seen as an attempt to better society, but it does so in a divisive manner. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity, given the accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.